Please tweet and retweet
Asian Patient Before-After Surgical Rhinoplasty with Medpor Implant to the Bridge
Non-surgical rhinoplasty has been around since the early 1900’s when surgeons used liquid paraffin to correct nasal imbalances. Although the corrections proved effective, the paraffin wound up being harmful to the body. As were the silicone fillers of the 1960’s. It’s only recently with the advent of hyaluronic acid fillers such as Voluma, Belotero, Juvederm and Restylane that the non-surgical rhinoplasty has become a plausible reality.
This month an article published in Dermatologic Surgery and another in Aesthetic Surgery Journal tout the benefits of non-surgical rhinoplasty with injection of a hyaluronate filler into the nose. The first out of a South Korean clinic used the filler to augment the bridge and/or rotate the tip with a 1% rate of vascular complications. Those cases were attributed to the use of a needle instead of a cannula but they did prove the efficacy of the procedure. The second looked at Asian patients in Australia and Brazil undergoing the procedure and reported that nearly 80% were satisfied or very satisfied with the filler treatment 12 months out. 85 to 90% said they would recommend the procedures to others. It is not clear which hyaluronate is best for this procedure or if other types of fillers can/should be used.
The take home message is non-surgical filler rhinoplasty can produce temporary results that are comparable to surgical augmentation rhinoplasty. However, the key word is temporary and this is likely best used on the bridge below the radix level or injected from below upwards. Injections directly into the radix near the eyebrow level, in the tip or on the sides/creases of the nose where the blood vessels are is more likely to result in vascular complications i.e. skin and possibly deeper tissue loss. The material can cause a problem by being injected directly into an artery or vein or by compressing a blood vessel by mass effect. Some fillers absorb water over time like a sponge so their compressive effect is delayed. There is a remote chance the injected material migrates to the eye causing blindness. Consent forms for the procedure should list the possible complications of blindness and skin loss due to vascular compromise. If you have increasing intolerable pain after these injections you may have impending skin loss and need to be treated within 24 hours. The best way to avoid a complication is to not inject directly into the areas described above, make a skin hole with a small 22G needle near the midline and then inject 0.1cc aliquots through this hole with a 25G blunt tipped cannula just superficial to the periosteum and deep to the blood vessels. Some doctors mix the hyaluronate with local anesthetic to thin it and make it less likely to adversely affect blood vessels.
The best candidates for this procedure are those with deficient nasal bridges and thick nasal skin (like Asians), those who cannot undergo the down time associated with surgery or take time off work, those who are prone to or afraid of complications like scar contracture or thinning of the nasal tip and those who cannot afford surgery or want to try out the surgical result before committing to surgery. If you have had a bad experience with previous rhinoplasty surgery you might be more willing to undergo a non-surgical correction of the problem. You of course cannot refine the nasal tip, make a big nose smaller, fix valve collapse (although some doctors believe it can temporarily resolve internal valve collapse), narrow a boxy tip, decrease tip projection, treat impaired airflow due to septal deviation, change columellar show or narrow the alar base by just injecting filler. Non-surgical temporary filler rhinoplasty has a role when filler is placed directly on top of bone or cartilage to fill a depression, camouflage a hump, change the nose lip angle or raise the tip slightly but it cannot replace rhinoplasty surgery and their use in this setting is off label i.e. not FDA approved at this time. Permanent fillers should not be injected into the nose because of the risk of vascular compromise, uncorrectable irregularities and granulomas.
December 21, 2017 Addendum:
A just published review of publicly available court records involving malpractice litigation arising from soft-tissue fillers used in the face found that dorsal nasal bridge injections were significantly associated with blindness. Therefore you should think twice before undergoing non-surgical rhinoplasty.
Dr. Aaron Stone - Plastic Surgeon Los Angeles
Dr. Stone's Twitter
Skincare, maker of topical anti-aging skin care products, partners with 
, an analyzer of American city demographics, to produce a yearly ranking of US cities with respect to skin aging and wrinkling. In their analyses the top 5 factors contributing to skin aging/wrinkling are low winter temperatures, extreme weather temperatures, commuter times, sunny days (UV exposure), and elevation. Other contributors are stressful living, dry heat, ozone pollution, sleep deprivation and smoking rates. Although UVB is blocked by glass up to 72% of the UVA radiation of the sun, that which damages and ages the skin, still penetrates ordinary glass. So those with long commutes have significant sun exposure. The risks for skin wrinkles obviously overlaps with skin cancer risks. In 2015 New York was the most wrinkle prone and Alaska was the least most wrinkle prone state. California came in at 36th , Texas at 38th and Florida at 32nd.
